Showing posts with label containing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label containing. Show all posts

Friday, March 16, 2012

"Timeout Expired" on large table change

I have a table containing several hundred thousand rows. Once of the
fields in the table is named EODFeedDate. The field is nullable. I've
decided that I do NOT want that field to be nullable. I've unchecked the
"allow nulls" checkbox for the field in Management Studio. I then tried to
save my schema change. I'm getting the following error from Management
Studio:
"Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the
operation or the server is not responding."
I can't figure out what's causing the problem. It's worth nothing that:
- Of the current entries in this table, none of them have EODFeedDate
set to null so making the field non-nullable should cause a conflict.
- No one else is connected to the database. It's a private development
machine -- so it isn't a contention problem.
Any ideas?
David
> "Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the
> operation or the server is not responding."
> I can't figure out what's causing the problem.
I did a google search on this. You have to write a query to workaround this
bug. I've never written query code to modify a table before; I've always
used the UI, so I had some learning to do.
I learned about the ALTER TABLE statement but my execution of that statement
failed. The error message stated that the column could not be made
non-nullable because there is an index on the table that made use of the
column in question. That's when I learned about the DROP INDEX statement. By
using a DROP INDEX in tandem with an ALTER TABLE, I was able to make the
field non-nullable. I then re-created the index using the UI.
I've never spent so much time trying to do something so simple.
David
|||You can have Management Studio generate the script by making the change,
then right clicking the window and selecting "Generate Change Script"
"The One We Call 'Dave'" <ghetto@.englewood.com> wrote in message
news:-MOdnXQku9doHYXZnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@.giganews.com...
> I did a google search on this. You have to write a query to workaround
> this bug. I've never written query code to modify a table before; I've
> always used the UI, so I had some learning to do.
> I learned about the ALTER TABLE statement but my execution of that
> statement failed. The error message stated that the column could not be
> made non-nullable because there is an index on the table that made use of
> the column in question. That's when I learned about the DROP INDEX
> statement. By using a DROP INDEX in tandem with an ALTER TABLE, I was able
> to make the field non-nullable. I then re-created the index using the UI.
> I've never spent so much time trying to do something so simple.
> David
>
|||"Michael D'Angelo" <nospamnmdange@.phoenixworx.org> wrote in message
news:uIYUXTHSGHA.4456@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> You can have Management Studio generate the script by making the change,
> then right clicking the window and selecting "Generate Change Script"
Doh! I didn't realize that!! Thanks for the tip. I'll be sure to make use of
that in the future.

"Timeout Expired" on large table change

I have a table containing several hundred thousand rows. Once of the
fields in the table is named EODFeedDate. The field is nullable. I've
decided that I do NOT want that field to be nullable. I've unchecked the
"allow nulls" checkbox for the field in Management Studio. I then tried to
save my schema change. I'm getting the following error from Management
Studio:
"Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the
operation or the server is not responding."
I can't figure out what's causing the problem. It's worth nothing that:
- Of the current entries in this table, none of them have EODFeedDate
set to null so making the field non-nullable should cause a conflict.
- No one else is connected to the database. It's a private development
machine -- so it isn't a contention problem.
Any ideas?
David> "Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the
> operation or the server is not responding."
> I can't figure out what's causing the problem.
I did a google search on this. You have to write a query to workaround this
bug. I've never written query code to modify a table before; I've always
used the UI, so I had some learning to do.
I learned about the ALTER TABLE statement but my execution of that statement
failed. The error message stated that the column could not be made
non-nullable because there is an index on the table that made use of the
column in question. That's when I learned about the DROP INDEX statement. By
using a DROP INDEX in tandem with an ALTER TABLE, I was able to make the
field non-nullable. I then re-created the index using the UI.
I've never spent so much time trying to do something so simple.
David|||You can have Management Studio generate the script by making the change,
then right clicking the window and selecting "Generate Change Script"
"The One We Call 'Dave'" <ghetto@.englewood.com> wrote in message
news:-MOdnXQku9doHYXZnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@.giganews.com...
> I did a google search on this. You have to write a query to workaround
> this bug. I've never written query code to modify a table before; I've
> always used the UI, so I had some learning to do.
> I learned about the ALTER TABLE statement but my execution of that
> statement failed. The error message stated that the column could not be
> made non-nullable because there is an index on the table that made use of
> the column in question. That's when I learned about the DROP INDEX
> statement. By using a DROP INDEX in tandem with an ALTER TABLE, I was able
> to make the field non-nullable. I then re-created the index using the UI.
> I've never spent so much time trying to do something so simple.
> David
>|||"Michael D'Angelo" <nospamnmdange@.phoenixworx.org> wrote in message
news:uIYUXTHSGHA.4456@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> You can have Management Studio generate the script by making the change,
> then right clicking the window and selecting "Generate Change Script"
Doh! I didn't realize that!! Thanks for the tip. I'll be sure to make use of
that in the future.

"Timeout Expired" on large table change

I have a table containing several hundred thousand rows. Once of the
fields in the table is named EODFeedDate. The field is nullable. I've
decided that I do NOT want that field to be nullable. I've unchecked the
"allow nulls" checkbox for the field in Management Studio. I then tried to
save my schema change. I'm getting the following error from Management
Studio:
"Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the
operation or the server is not responding."
I can't figure out what's causing the problem. It's worth nothing that:
- Of the current entries in this table, none of them have EODFeedDate
set to null so making the field non-nullable should cause a conflict.
- No one else is connected to the database. It's a private development
machine -- so it isn't a contention problem.
Any ideas?
David> "Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the
> operation or the server is not responding."
> I can't figure out what's causing the problem.
I did a google search on this. You have to write a query to workaround this
bug. I've never written query code to modify a table before; I've always
used the UI, so I had some learning to do.
I learned about the ALTER TABLE statement but my execution of that statement
failed. The error message stated that the column could not be made
non-nullable because there is an index on the table that made use of the
column in question. That's when I learned about the DROP INDEX statement. By
using a DROP INDEX in tandem with an ALTER TABLE, I was able to make the
field non-nullable. I then re-created the index using the UI.
I've never spent so much time trying to do something so simple. :(
David|||You can have Management Studio generate the script by making the change,
then right clicking the window and selecting "Generate Change Script"
"The One We Call 'Dave'" <ghetto@.englewood.com> wrote in message
news:-MOdnXQku9doHYXZnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@.giganews.com...
>> "Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the
>> operation or the server is not responding."
>> I can't figure out what's causing the problem.
> I did a google search on this. You have to write a query to workaround
> this bug. I've never written query code to modify a table before; I've
> always used the UI, so I had some learning to do.
> I learned about the ALTER TABLE statement but my execution of that
> statement failed. The error message stated that the column could not be
> made non-nullable because there is an index on the table that made use of
> the column in question. That's when I learned about the DROP INDEX
> statement. By using a DROP INDEX in tandem with an ALTER TABLE, I was able
> to make the field non-nullable. I then re-created the index using the UI.
> I've never spent so much time trying to do something so simple. :(
> David
>|||"Michael D'Angelo" <nospamnmdange@.phoenixworx.org> wrote in message
news:uIYUXTHSGHA.4456@.TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> You can have Management Studio generate the script by making the change,
> then right clicking the window and selecting "Generate Change Script"
Doh! I didn't realize that!! Thanks for the tip. I'll be sure to make use of
that in the future.

"SUM" of a varchar column?

I have a table that contains a number of columns containing either a varchar
value, or null. There are multiple rows per grouping. I would like to colapse
the multiple rows into a single row, either by appending the strings to each
other, or simply selecting the first (or last) one.
If it was a number field I could do a SUM, MAX or MIN. SUM doesn't work, for
obvious reasons. I thought MAX would work, but MAX returns only one value for
all of the columns (as opposed to one per column) and the rest are left as
null.
Any suggestions?
Here's an example...
The table contains this data, all items are varchar
32611317
3261Non-Client
32612
3261mmarkowitz
I'd like to turn this into...
3261 1317 Non-client 2 mmarkowitz
|||This looks like a PIVOT. Can you flatten this table out on the client? If
not, see http://www.aspfaq.com/2462
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
"Maury Markowitz" <MauryMarkowitz@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:7838E3D4-CD8D-46EB-A75F-D069B30EE9AB@.microsoft.com...
> I have a table that contains a number of columns containing either a
varchar
> value, or null. There are multiple rows per grouping. I would like to
colapse
> the multiple rows into a single row, either by appending the strings to
each
> other, or simply selecting the first (or last) one.
> If it was a number field I could do a SUM, MAX or MIN. SUM doesn't work,
for
> obvious reasons. I thought MAX would work, but MAX returns only one value
for
> all of the columns (as opposed to one per column) and the rest are left as
> null.
> Any suggestions?
|||"Maury Markowitz" <MauryMarkowitz@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:DD2FA7A5-A0F2-4BFF-85E9-42533F4E423C@.microsoft.com...
> Here's an example...
> The table contains this data, all items are varchar
>
> 3261 1317
> 3261 Non-Client
> 3261 2
> 3261 mmarkowitz
> I'd like to turn this into...
> 3261 1317 Non-client 2 mmarkowitz
I'm not sure if this will help, but you may want to take a look at the
GROUP BY WITH ROLLUP and WITH CUBE commands. It may work for what you are
after.
SELECT Col1, Max(Col2)
FROM tablename
GROUP BY Col1
WITH ROLLUP
HTH
Rick Sawtell
MCT, MCSD, MCDBA
|||SELECT col1, MAX(col2), MAX(col3), MAX(col4), ...
FROM YourTable
GROUP BY col1
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
|||I don't think this will work, he wants to flatten one ofthe two columns in
his table out into multiple columns...
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
"David Portas" <REMOVE_BEFORE_REPLYING_dportas@.acm.org> wrote in message
news:1103306604.369012.58920@.z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com...
> SELECT col1, MAX(col2), MAX(col3), MAX(col4), ...
> FROM YourTable
> GROUP BY col1
> --
> David Portas
> SQL Server MVP
> --
>
|||OK. Looks to me like 5 columns but I guess that's just presentational ;-)
Tough to pivot without an explicit attribute for the column.
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
|||"Aaron [SQL Server MVP]" wrote:

> This looks like a PIVOT.
Actually it is the RESULT of a pivot, which is why it is spread out
vertically like that.
But I did figure out a "trick". After reading the page you sent, I combined
their technique of ISNULL (instead of CASE) with MIN, and presto.
Thanks!
(anyone interested in the code?)

"SUM" of a varchar column?

I have a table that contains a number of columns containing either a varchar
value, or null. There are multiple rows per grouping. I would like to colapse
the multiple rows into a single row, either by appending the strings to each
other, or simply selecting the first (or last) one.
If it was a number field I could do a SUM, MAX or MIN. SUM doesn't work, for
obvious reasons. I thought MAX would work, but MAX returns only one value for
all of the columns (as opposed to one per column) and the rest are left as
null.
Any suggestions?Here's an example...
The table contains this data, all items are varchar
3261 1317
3261 Non-Client
3261 2
3261 mmarkowitz
I'd like to turn this into...
3261 1317 Non-client 2 mmarkowitz|||This looks like a PIVOT. Can you flatten this table out on the client? If
not, see http://www.aspfaq.com/2462
--
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
"Maury Markowitz" <MauryMarkowitz@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:7838E3D4-CD8D-46EB-A75F-D069B30EE9AB@.microsoft.com...
> I have a table that contains a number of columns containing either a
varchar
> value, or null. There are multiple rows per grouping. I would like to
colapse
> the multiple rows into a single row, either by appending the strings to
each
> other, or simply selecting the first (or last) one.
> If it was a number field I could do a SUM, MAX or MIN. SUM doesn't work,
for
> obvious reasons. I thought MAX would work, but MAX returns only one value
for
> all of the columns (as opposed to one per column) and the rest are left as
> null.
> Any suggestions?|||"Maury Markowitz" <MauryMarkowitz@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:DD2FA7A5-A0F2-4BFF-85E9-42533F4E423C@.microsoft.com...
> Here's an example...
> The table contains this data, all items are varchar
>
> 3261 1317
> 3261 Non-Client
> 3261 2
> 3261 mmarkowitz
> I'd like to turn this into...
> 3261 1317 Non-client 2 mmarkowitz
I'm not sure if this will help, but you may want to take a look at the
GROUP BY WITH ROLLUP and WITH CUBE commands. It may work for what you are
after.
SELECT Col1, Max(Col2)
FROM tablename
GROUP BY Col1
WITH ROLLUP
HTH
Rick Sawtell
MCT, MCSD, MCDBA|||SELECT col1, MAX(col2), MAX(col3), MAX(col4), ...
FROM YourTable
GROUP BY col1
--
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
--|||I don't think this will work, he wants to flatten one ofthe two columns in
his table out into multiple columns...
--
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
"David Portas" <REMOVE_BEFORE_REPLYING_dportas@.acm.org> wrote in message
news:1103306604.369012.58920@.z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> SELECT col1, MAX(col2), MAX(col3), MAX(col4), ...
> FROM YourTable
> GROUP BY col1
> --
> David Portas
> SQL Server MVP
> --
>|||OK. Looks to me like 5 columns but I guess that's just presentational ;-)
Tough to pivot without an explicit attribute for the column.
--
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
--|||"Aaron [SQL Server MVP]" wrote:
> This looks like a PIVOT.
Actually it is the RESULT of a pivot, which is why it is spread out
vertically like that.
But I did figure out a "trick". After reading the page you sent, I combined
their technique of ISNULL (instead of CASE) with MIN, and presto.
Thanks!
(anyone interested in the code?)

Sunday, February 19, 2012

"group by" by excluding prefix

Suppose there is a table containing these recodes.

country
---
CON_CHN
CON_JAP
JAP
CON_CHN

When I use the following sql:
select country, count(*) as num from table group by country

the normal result will be:
country num
-----
CON_CHN2
CON_JAP 1
JAP1

However, my desired result is as follows:
country num
------
CON_CHN2
CON_JAP 2

How can I re-write my SQL? Or any other methods to do that?Is the length of the string (prefix or sufix) fixed? Can the string be
something like CON_CANA ? Also, it would help if you provided sample
scripts...

MC

"littlebeam" <cyrus.lan@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144831660.591396.269760@.e56g2000cwe.googlegr oups.com...
> Suppose there is a table containing these recodes.
> country
> ---
> CON_CHN
> CON_JAP
> JAP
> CON_CHN
> When I use the following sql:
> select country, count(*) as num from table group by country
> the normal result will be:
> country num
> -----
> CON_CHN 2
> CON_JAP 1
> JAP 1
> However, my desired result is as follows:
> country num
> ------
> CON_CHN 2
> CON_JAP 2
> How can I re-write my SQL? Or any other methods to do that?|||If your prefix is always "CON_" then this should work

SELECT Replace(country, 'CON_',''), COUNT(Replace(country, 'CON_',''))
from myTable
Group by Replace(country, 'CON_','')

Markus