"This Machine Only" and "Stop Processing More Rules" Questions

I'm running Outlook 2003 on a Win 2kServer machine.
When setting up a rule, what is the purpose of the "this machine only"
option? I did not notice this option in previous versions of Outlook. Why
would someone setup a rule without this option? What is the effect if this
option is not selected? Is it possible to share rules between different
machines?
For the "Stop processing more rules" - I'm assuming that this option is only
executed when the rule matches. For example, if rule #1 says "if sender is
abc@.xyz.com, move this message to xyz folder, and stop processing more
rules", and the message is not from that sender, shouldn't Outlook then move
on to rule #2? Also, if you get a hit on a rule with incoming message
number 1, shouldn't the rules start again from the top for message #2, or
does the "stop processing more rules" keep this from happening? I'm seeing
a situation where, when I get some new messages, it appears that the rules
don't immediately run. I can't tell if one of them is firing then the rules
stop processing the rest of the messages. If I go and click the
Send/Receive button, the rules will all run.
Thanks,
John Schneider
Sorry! I inadvertently posted this to the wrong newsgroup.
"John Schneider" <JohnDONTSPAMME.Schneider@.eWebITNOSPAM.Kom> wrote in
message news:eTTXupW0EHA.2676@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I'm running Outlook 2003 on a Win 2kServer machine.
> When setting up a rule, what is the purpose of the "this machine only"
> option? I did not notice this option in previous versions of Outlook.
Why
> would someone setup a rule without this option? What is the effect if
this
> option is not selected? Is it possible to share rules between different
> machines?
> For the "Stop processing more rules" - I'm assuming that this option is
only
> executed when the rule matches. For example, if rule #1 says "if sender
is
> abc@.xyz.com, move this message to xyz folder, and stop processing more
> rules", and the message is not from that sender, shouldn't Outlook then
move
> on to rule #2? Also, if you get a hit on a rule with incoming message
> number 1, shouldn't the rules start again from the top for message #2, or
> does the "stop processing more rules" keep this from happening? I'm
seeing
> a situation where, when I get some new messages, it appears that the rules
> don't immediately run. I can't tell if one of them is firing then the
rules
> stop processing the rest of the messages. If I go and click the
> Send/Receive button, the rules will all run.
> Thanks,
> John Schneider
>

"File and Print Sharing for Microsoft Networks"

In Win 2k or above, how to check PC that is
installed "File and Print Sharing for Microsoft Networks"
by programming or Windows API?
hi,
"Allcomp" <fa097770@.nospam.skynet.be> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:40c41274$0$9536$a0ced6e1@.news.skynet.be...
> Hello,
> I am interested too, but I don't have a suscription. Do yuu have another
> solution too?
> Do you know if it it possible to install this service if it is not enabled
> on the computer (to allow a user to install MSDE without having to
> understand anything on his computer)?
unfortunately not...
Andrea Montanari (Microsoft MVP - SQL Server)
http://www.asql.biz/DbaMgr.shtmhttp://italy.mvps.org
DbaMgr2k ver 0.8.0 - DbaMgr ver 0.54.0
(my vb6+sql-dmo little try to provide MS MSDE 1.0 and MSDE 2000 a visual
interface)
-- remove DMO to reply

"Cannot Generate SSPI Context" for the server itself

Basically the windows authentication is not working at all on this newly
installed sql 2k on win 2k, even it is not coming up at the server itself.
The Authentication is on the mix mode but only sql authentication works. It
is interesting when I use the sa (at the server) to connect it shows few
databases (excluding master, temp, msdb,…) and when I login locally as admin
to the box using sa it shows all dbs. This machine is connected to the SAN
but it is not clustered. The identical server at the disaster site does not
have this problem!
I looked at articles but they are all refer to a computer connecting to the
server. The admin who installed this left the organization and I have no idea
how he did the installation or even if he renamed this sql server after the
installation.
Any ideas where I should look?
Thank you,
I take the part with system databases not shown back.
The Authentication problem exist when the server is on the netwrok. Anywhere
I should look?
Thank you.
"ktf" wrote:

> Basically the windows authentication is not working at all on this newly
> installed sql 2k on win 2k, even it is not coming up at the server itself.
> The Authentication is on the mix mode but only sql authentication works. It
> is interesting when I use the sa (at the server) to connect it shows few
> databases (excluding master, temp, msdb,…) and when I login locally as admin
> to the box using sa it shows all dbs. This machine is connected to the SAN
> but it is not clustered. The identical server at the disaster site does not
> have this problem!
> I looked at articles but they are all refer to a computer connecting to the
> server. The admin who installed this left the organization and I have no idea
> how he did the installation or even if he renamed this sql server after the
> installation.
> Any ideas where I should look?
> Thank you,
|||FYI,
I added 'Named Pipes' into Client Network Utility and it fixed my problem.
ktf
"ktf" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> I take the part with system databases not shown back.
> The Authentication problem exist when the server is on the netwrok. Anywhere
> I should look?
> Thank you.
> "ktf" wrote:

"Cannot Generate SSPI Context" for the server itself

Basically the windows authentication is not working at all on this newly
installed sql 2k on win 2k, even it is not coming up at the server itself.
The Authentication is on the mix mode but only sql authentication works. It
is interesting when I use the sa (at the server) to connect it shows few
databases (excluding master, temp, msdb,â?¦) and when I login locally as admin
to the box using sa it shows all dbs. This machine is connected to the SAN
but it is not clustered. The identical server at the disaster site does not
have this problem!
I looked at articles but they are all refer to a computer connecting to the
server. The admin who installed this left the organization and I have no idea
how he did the installation or even if he renamed this sql server after the
installation.
Any ideas where I should look?
Thank you,I take the part with system databases not shown back.
The Authentication problem exist when the server is on the netwrok. Anywhere
I should look?
Thank you.
"ktf" wrote:
> Basically the windows authentication is not working at all on this newly
> installed sql 2k on win 2k, even it is not coming up at the server itself.
> The Authentication is on the mix mode but only sql authentication works. It
> is interesting when I use the sa (at the server) to connect it shows few
> databases (excluding master, temp, msdb,â?¦) and when I login locally as admin
> to the box using sa it shows all dbs. This machine is connected to the SAN
> but it is not clustered. The identical server at the disaster site does not
> have this problem!
> I looked at articles but they are all refer to a computer connecting to the
> server. The admin who installed this left the organization and I have no idea
> how he did the installation or even if he renamed this sql server after the
> installation.
> Any ideas where I should look?
> Thank you,|||FYI,
I added 'Named Pipes' into Client Network Utility and it fixed my problem.
ktf
"ktf" wrote:
> I take the part with system databases not shown back.
> The Authentication problem exist when the server is on the netwrok. Anywhere
> I should look?
> Thank you.
> "ktf" wrote:
> > Basically the windows authentication is not working at all on this newly
> > installed sql 2k on win 2k, even it is not coming up at the server itself.
> > The Authentication is on the mix mode but only sql authentication works. It
> > is interesting when I use the sa (at the server) to connect it shows few
> > databases (excluding master, temp, msdb,â?¦) and when I login locally as admin
> > to the box using sa it shows all dbs. This machine is connected to the SAN
> > but it is not clustered. The identical server at the disaster site does not
> > have this problem!
> > I looked at articles but they are all refer to a computer connecting to the
> > server. The admin who installed this left the organization and I have no idea
> > how he did the installation or even if he renamed this sql server after the
> > installation.
> > Any ideas where I should look?
> > Thank you,

"Cannot Generate SSPI Context" for the server itself

Basically the windows authentication is not working at all on this newly
installed sql 2k on win 2k, even it is not coming up at the server itself.
The Authentication is on the mix mode but only sql authentication works. It
is interesting when I use the sa (at the server) to connect it shows few
databases (excluding master, temp, msdb,…) and when I login locally as adm
in
to the box using sa it shows all dbs. This machine is connected to the SAN
but it is not clustered. The identical server at the disaster site does not
have this problem!
I looked at articles but they are all refer to a computer connecting to the
server. The admin who installed this left the organization and I have no ide
a
how he did the installation or even if he renamed this sql server after the
installation.
Any ideas where I should look?
Thank you,I take the part with system databases not shown back.
The Authentication problem exist when the server is on the netwrok. Anywhere
I should look?
Thank you.
"ktf" wrote:

> Basically the windows authentication is not working at all on this newly
> installed sql 2k on win 2k, even it is not coming up at the server itself.
> The Authentication is on the mix mode but only sql authentication works. I
t
> is interesting when I use the sa (at the server) to connect it shows few
> databases (excluding master, temp, msdb,…) and when I login locally as a
dmin
> to the box using sa it shows all dbs. This machine is connected to the SAN
> but it is not clustered. The identical server at the disaster site does no
t
> have this problem!
> I looked at articles but they are all refer to a computer connecting to th
e
> server. The admin who installed this left the organization and I have no i
dea
> how he did the installation or even if he renamed this sql server after th
e
> installation.
> Any ideas where I should look?
> Thank you,|||FYI,
I added 'Named Pipes' into Client Network Utility and it fixed my problem.
ktf
"ktf" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> I take the part with system databases not shown back.
> The Authentication problem exist when the server is on the netwrok. Anywhe
re
> I should look?
> Thank you.
> "ktf" wrote:
>