"View Report" button.

Would someone be able to tell me if this is a bug or not. When I have two
parameters (both text boxes) and change the first one and click on the "View
Report" button to refresh the data with the new parameter values it blanks
the report out and I do not see "processing report" like I normally do. On
the second click it processes the report.
When I change a parameter in the second text box and click "View Report", it
processes the first click.
Seems like a bug of sorts. Anyone encounter this before? I'm more than
happy to provide the RDL.
Best Regards,
Benjamin PierceThis sometimes happens if parameter 2 has values based on a query and the
value of that query is dependent on the value of parameter 1 (hierarchical
parameters).
What happens is that when you choose a value for P1, we try to go back and
get values for P2. Now before we get those values the user clicks view
report. Since you've requested a to view a report with only one parameter
specified, we send back a page asking for the second parameter value.
However due to browser refresh, it doesn't look like anything happened. Now
you provide a value for parameter 2, you get the report rendered.
You can make this stop happening by providing a default value for parameter
2.
-Lukasz
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Benjamin Pierce" <bpierce@.opentext.com> wrote in message
news:ujptP0AcEHA.384@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Hello,
> Would someone be able to tell me if this is a bug or not. When I have two
> parameters (both text boxes) and change the first one and click on the
> "View
> Report" button to refresh the data with the new parameter values it blanks
> the report out and I do not see "processing report" like I normally do.
> On
> the second click it processes the report.
> When I change a parameter in the second text box and click "View Report",
> it
> processes the first click.
> Seems like a bug of sorts. Anyone encounter this before? I'm more than
> happy to provide the RDL.
>
> Benjamin Pierce
>

"unable to load MDT2G.DLL" (sql 7.0)?

I'm using sql server 7.0 - on "SQL Server Enterprise Manager" screen,
when I right click a table and select "Design Table" on the menu list,
I get error message box "Unable to load MDT2G.DLL".
I never had this before and don't know what happend.
What caused this and how to fix it ?
THANKS !
>
> I'm using sql server 7.0 - on "SQL Server Enterprise Manager"
> screen, when I right click a table and select "Design Table" on
> the menu list, I get error message box "Unable to load MDT2G.DLL".
> I never had this before and don't know what happened.
> What caused this and how to fix it ?
> THANKS !
>
The mdt2g.dll file could be corrupt. Try copying over it from your SQL CD
and see if it works for you.
Regards,
Eric Crdenas
Senior support professional
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"unable to load MDT2G.DLL" (sql 7.0)?

I'm using sql server 7.0 - on "SQL Server Enterprise Manager" screen,
when I right click a table and select "Design Table" on the menu list,
I get error message box "Unable to load MDT2G.DLL".
I never had this before and don't know what happend.
What caused this and how to fix it ?
THANKS !>
> I'm using sql server 7.0 - on "SQL Server Enterprise Manager"
> screen, when I right click a table and select "Design Table" on
> the menu list, I get error message box "Unable to load MDT2G.DLL".
> I never had this before and don't know what happened.
> What caused this and how to fix it ?
> THANKS !
>
--
The mdt2g.dll file could be corrupt. Try copying over it from your SQL CD
and see if it works for you.
Regards,
Eric Crdenas
Senior support professional
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"Timeout expired" error occuring while fetching the data with SQL Server 2000

Hello,
I have one application which is having written inasp.net & plainasp.
I am having one button on asp page,
when i will click on that button, then itwill execute one other asp page.
And after the execution of that second asp page, I redirect it to some
ASPX page with some values.
On the ASPX page, it will connect to the Database, and insert the values.
Thus, sometime, the following error is occuring :
"Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding."

Main thing is that i am testing it on my local machine, then also it is giving me this error ...
Insert into statement is also not much complicated :
just I inserted three values in one table.
Is this occuring due to the mixer of asp & aspx??
Plz give me some proper solution.
I want it in efficient manner, because this application will be accessed by number of users at the same time.
Plz help me.


Thanks,
Sandy
Have you been able to pointpint exactly where the bottleneck is occuring? Is the INSERT statement definitely the culprit?
|||Yes...
for insert statement.
But I think this is not creating any matter.
matter is the connection with DB.
This is not occuring everytime.
It's frequancy is 30%.
But for number of users concurrent access, i am not sure is it same or may be increase.
Currently I am using the following connection string :
ConnectionString="Data Source=localhost;Initial Catalog=myDataBase;User ID=test;Password=test;min pool size=1; max pool size=300"

If there is any issue in this string, plz let me know.
Plz give me the feasible solution ASAP.
Thanks,
Sandy
|||I'd use Performance Monitor to check how well your connection pooling is working for you. See this article:Tuning Up ADO.NET Connection Pooling in ASP.NET Applications, in particular the Monitoring Connection Pooling Behavior section

"Open Table Window" is read-only under SQL Query Analyzer

I have installed SQL Server 2000 with option "Client Tools Only"
I try to edit data using SQL Query Analyzer with Trusted Connection. I click on 'Open' of right-click on table objects. A "Open Table Window" is opened as read-only!!! "Add" and "Delete" are grey out!! I can't edit data.
I am trying to edit data using Server Explorer under Microsoft .NET with Trusted Connection. It works!!!
Help, Help!
Maybe the table does not have a Primary Key, check this first.
Dejan Sarka, SQL Server MVP
Associate Mentor
Solid Quality Learning
More than just Training
www.SolidQualityLearning.com
"Happy Programmer" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9D59D138-BFAE-4CAB-A2C1-FF535B42F2C7@.microsoft.com...
> I have installed SQL Server 2000 with option "Client Tools Only"
> I try to edit data using SQL Query Analyzer with Trusted Connection. I
click on 'Open' of right-click on table objects. A "Open Table Window" is
opened as read-only!!! "Add" and "Delete" are grey out!! I can't edit
data.
> I am trying to edit data using Server Explorer under Microsoft .NET with
Trusted Connection. It works!!!
> Help, Help!
|||I believe that you will only be able to modify data from the Open Table
function in Query Analyzer if the table has a primary key or unique
constraint or a unique index.
Steve Kass
Drew University
Happy Programmer wrote:

>I have installed SQL Server 2000 with option "Client Tools Only"
>I try to edit data using SQL Query Analyzer with Trusted Connection. I click on 'Open' of right-click on table objects. A "Open Table Window" is opened as read-only!!! "Add" and "Delete" are grey out!! I can't edit data.
>I am trying to edit data using Server Explorer under Microsoft .NET with Trusted Connection. It works!!!
>Help, Help!
>
|||I've tried it. It is able to modify if the table has primary key or unique index.
But is able to edit data using Server Explorer under Microsoft .NET with Trusted Connection even it has not any key or index.
Anyway, thanks a lot~!

"Display Dependencies" not showing all dependencies

Within Sql Server Enterprise, I click on an object to show dependencies, and
there is something I am not seeing here.
For example, I want to see all dependencies for a given table. It shows a
view and a couple of stored procedures that perform SELECT statements.
However, there is a stored procedure that performs UPDATE and INSERT against
that particular table, but I am not seeing on in the Display Dependencies
screen.
When I attempt to see the Dependencies screen on the stored procedure that
does UPDATE and INSERT, I am not seeing the table listed.
There seems to be a disconnect some place either in my head or in Enterprise
Manager. What am I missing? How can I display, all, I mean ALL
dependencies? For a given table, I want stored procedures listed if they do
ANYTHING on the table. And views. And functions. All dependencies,
period. How can I do that?
Because of deferred name resolution and other factors, then you won't
necessarily see all dependencies (e.g. depending on the order the objects
were created). I think one way to solve would be to recompile the stored
procedures, but I still don't think that will guarantee all dependencies
will show up... there are other things that aren't captured by sp_depends,
e.g. dynamic SQL.
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
"David C" <nospam@.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:0oh6d.21182$OB2.1947@.twister.socal.rr.com...
> Within Sql Server Enterprise, I click on an object to show dependencies,
and
> there is something I am not seeing here.
> For example, I want to see all dependencies for a given table. It shows a
> view and a couple of stored procedures that perform SELECT statements.
> However, there is a stored procedure that performs UPDATE and INSERT
against
> that particular table, but I am not seeing on in the Display Dependencies
> screen.
> When I attempt to see the Dependencies screen on the stored procedure that
> does UPDATE and INSERT, I am not seeing the table listed.
> There seems to be a disconnect some place either in my head or in
Enterprise
> Manager. What am I missing? How can I display, all, I mean ALL
> dependencies? For a given table, I want stored procedures listed if they
do
> ANYTHING on the table. And views. And functions. All dependencies,
> period. How can I do that?
>
|||So do you have a suggestion?
I would like to re-engineer a table (changing a column type), so I need to
find all objects that talk to this table.
If "Display Dependencies" does not do what it's supposed to, then what
purpose does it serve other than giving partial answers?
"Aaron [SQL Server MVP]" <ten.xoc@.dnartreb.noraa> wrote in message
news:uZaO$RYpEHA.1960@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Because of deferred name resolution and other factors, then you won't
> necessarily see all dependencies (e.g. depending on the order the objects
> were created). I think one way to solve would be to recompile the stored
> procedures, but I still don't think that will guarantee all dependencies
> will show up... there are other things that aren't captured by sp_depends,
> e.g. dynamic SQL.
> --
> http://www.aspfaq.com/
> (Reverse address to reply.)
>
>
> "David C" <nospam@.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:0oh6d.21182$OB2.1947@.twister.socal.rr.com...
> and
> against
> Enterprise
> do
>
|||> If "Display Dependencies" does not do what it's supposed to, then what
> purpose does it serve other than giving partial answers?
In some scenarios, it does give the right answer (e.g. if you compile all of
your stored procedures after all their dependent objects have been created,
don't alter anything, and don't use dynamic SQL).
For all other scenarios, my only suggestion is to parse the text from
syscomments or INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES for the name of your table.
And please remember, the people here are merely trying to help you. We did
not design SQL Server, have no control over the dependencies functionality,
and can't explain why they bothered putting it into the product.
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
|||
> In some scenarios, it does give the right answer (e.g. if you compile all
> of
> your stored procedures after all their dependent objects have been
> created,
> don't alter anything, and don't use dynamic SQL).
>
How does one recompile all the stored procedures with one command? Is there
a way to do that? How about Views and User functions?
> For all other scenarios, my only suggestion is to parse the text from
> syscomments or INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES for the name of your table.
> And please remember, the people here are merely trying to help you. We
> did
> not design SQL Server, have no control over the dependencies
> functionality,
> and can't explain why they bothered putting it into the product.
Your point is well taken.
|||> How does one recompile all the stored procedures with one command?
If you alter one table, do you have to recompile all stored procedures?
Unlikely.

> How does one recompile all the stored procedures with one command? Is
there
> a way to do that? How about Views and User functions?
This will generate the command for procs and functions, but not run it.
SELECT
CHAR(13)+CHAR(10)+'EXEC sp_recompile '''+ROUTINE_NAME+''';'
+CHAR(13)+CHAR(10)+'EXEC '+ROUTINE_NAME+';'
+CHAR(13)+CHAR(10)+'GO;'
FROM
INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES
For views,
SELECT
CHAR(13)+CHAR(10)+'EXEC sp_recompile '''+TABLE_NAME+''';'
+CHAR(13)+CHAR(10)+'EXEC '+TABLE_NAME+';'
+CHAR(13)+CHAR(10)+'GO;'
INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_TYPE='view'
In both cases, use Query Analyzer with results to text. Run the code, and
copy the output from the bottom pane to the upper pane or a new window. You
may want to add filters to leave out system or other specific objects.
Keep in mind that this still does not guarantee that sp_depends or some GUI
red herring like "Display Dependencies" will work flawlessly, because of
other factors I mentioned earlier.
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)

"Display Dependencies" not showing all dependencies

Within Sql Server Enterprise, I click on an object to show dependencies, and
there is something I am not seeing here.
For example, I want to see all dependencies for a given table. It shows a
view and a couple of stored procedures that perform SELECT statements.
However, there is a stored procedure that performs UPDATE and INSERT against
that particular table, but I am not seeing on in the Display Dependencies
screen.
When I attempt to see the Dependencies screen on the stored procedure that
does UPDATE and INSERT, I am not seeing the table listed.
There seems to be a disconnect some place either in my head or in Enterprise
Manager. What am I missing? How can I display, all, I mean ALL
dependencies? For a given table, I want stored procedures listed if they do
ANYTHING on the table. And views. And functions. All dependencies,
period. How can I do that?Because of deferred name resolution and other factors, then you won't
necessarily see all dependencies (e.g. depending on the order the objects
were created). I think one way to solve would be to recompile the stored
procedures, but I still don't think that will guarantee all dependencies
will show up... there are other things that aren't captured by sp_depends,
e.g. dynamic SQL.
--
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)
"David C" <nospam@.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:0oh6d.21182$OB2.1947@.twister.socal.rr.com...
> Within Sql Server Enterprise, I click on an object to show dependencies,
and
> there is something I am not seeing here.
> For example, I want to see all dependencies for a given table. It shows a
> view and a couple of stored procedures that perform SELECT statements.
> However, there is a stored procedure that performs UPDATE and INSERT
against
> that particular table, but I am not seeing on in the Display Dependencies
> screen.
> When I attempt to see the Dependencies screen on the stored procedure that
> does UPDATE and INSERT, I am not seeing the table listed.
> There seems to be a disconnect some place either in my head or in
Enterprise
> Manager. What am I missing? How can I display, all, I mean ALL
> dependencies? For a given table, I want stored procedures listed if they
do
> ANYTHING on the table. And views. And functions. All dependencies,
> period. How can I do that?
>|||So do you have a suggestion?
I would like to re-engineer a table (changing a column type), so I need to
find all objects that talk to this table.
If "Display Dependencies" does not do what it's supposed to, then what
purpose does it serve other than giving partial answers?
"Aaron [SQL Server MVP]" <ten.xoc@.dnartreb.noraa> wrote in message
news:uZaO$RYpEHA.1960@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Because of deferred name resolution and other factors, then you won't
> necessarily see all dependencies (e.g. depending on the order the objects
> were created). I think one way to solve would be to recompile the stored
> procedures, but I still don't think that will guarantee all dependencies
> will show up... there are other things that aren't captured by sp_depends,
> e.g. dynamic SQL.
> --
> http://www.aspfaq.com/
> (Reverse address to reply.)
>
>
> "David C" <nospam@.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:0oh6d.21182$OB2.1947@.twister.socal.rr.com...
>> Within Sql Server Enterprise, I click on an object to show dependencies,
> and
>> there is something I am not seeing here.
>> For example, I want to see all dependencies for a given table. It shows
>> a
>> view and a couple of stored procedures that perform SELECT statements.
>> However, there is a stored procedure that performs UPDATE and INSERT
> against
>> that particular table, but I am not seeing on in the Display Dependencies
>> screen.
>> When I attempt to see the Dependencies screen on the stored procedure
>> that
>> does UPDATE and INSERT, I am not seeing the table listed.
>> There seems to be a disconnect some place either in my head or in
> Enterprise
>> Manager. What am I missing? How can I display, all, I mean ALL
>> dependencies? For a given table, I want stored procedures listed if they
> do
>> ANYTHING on the table. And views. And functions. All dependencies,
>> period. How can I do that?
>>
>|||> If "Display Dependencies" does not do what it's supposed to, then what
> purpose does it serve other than giving partial answers?
In some scenarios, it does give the right answer (e.g. if you compile all of
your stored procedures after all their dependent objects have been created,
don't alter anything, and don't use dynamic SQL).
For all other scenarios, my only suggestion is to parse the text from
syscomments or INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES for the name of your table.
And please remember, the people here are merely trying to help you. We did
not design SQL Server, have no control over the dependencies functionality,
and can't explain why they bothered putting it into the product.
--
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)|||> In some scenarios, it does give the right answer (e.g. if you compile all
> of
> your stored procedures after all their dependent objects have been
> created,
> don't alter anything, and don't use dynamic SQL).
>
How does one recompile all the stored procedures with one command? Is there
a way to do that? How about Views and User functions?
> For all other scenarios, my only suggestion is to parse the text from
> syscomments or INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES for the name of your table.
> And please remember, the people here are merely trying to help you. We
> did
> not design SQL Server, have no control over the dependencies
> functionality,
> and can't explain why they bothered putting it into the product.
Your point is well taken.|||> How does one recompile all the stored procedures with one command?
If you alter one table, do you have to recompile all stored procedures?
Unlikely.
> How does one recompile all the stored procedures with one command? Is
there
> a way to do that? How about Views and User functions?
This will generate the command for procs and functions, but not run it.
SELECT
CHAR(13)+CHAR(10)+'EXEC sp_recompile '''+ROUTINE_NAME+''';'
+CHAR(13)+CHAR(10)+'EXEC '+ROUTINE_NAME+';'
+CHAR(13)+CHAR(10)+'GO;'
FROM
INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES
For views,
SELECT
CHAR(13)+CHAR(10)+'EXEC sp_recompile '''+TABLE_NAME+''';'
+CHAR(13)+CHAR(10)+'EXEC '+TABLE_NAME+';'
+CHAR(13)+CHAR(10)+'GO;'
INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_TYPE='view'
In both cases, use Query Analyzer with results to text. Run the code, and
copy the output from the bottom pane to the upper pane or a new window. You
may want to add filters to leave out system or other specific objects.
Keep in mind that this still does not guarantee that sp_depends or some GUI
red herring like "Display Dependencies" will work flawlessly, because of
other factors I mentioned earlier.
--
http://www.aspfaq.com/
(Reverse address to reply.)